Skip to content
STRATUSWORKFORCE SCAN

Credit Analysts

In short: today's best AI models could do about 95% of this job's working time (projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index) if the work were set up for them, and about 99% by the end of 2028 if progress keeps its long-run pace. The conversations, in-person and hands-on work, about 1% of the time, stays with people.

Compare with another job

Analyze credit data and financial statements of individuals or firms to determine the degree of risk involved in extending credit or lending money. Prepare reports with credit information for use in decisionmaking.

64,390 people do this job in the US. $83,510 a year.

Reviewed on October 2, 2026: what each task is made of, and what handing it over would ask.

A typical 40-hour week

  • AI could take on0 h
  • A person checks AI's work38 h
  • Desk work AI can't do yet1 h
  • Stays with people1 h

Credit Analysts, now: of a 40-hour week, AI could take on 0 hours, 38 hours become checking its work, 1 hours are desk work it can't do yet, and 1 hours stay with people.

The largest pieces: Analyze credit risk (about 9 h, a person checks); Complete loan applications for committee (about 7 h, a person checks); Compare borrowers with their peers (about 7 h, a person checks).

Estimates for a typical week of this job, if progress keeps its long-run pace, counting work the best models finish four times in five. Every task is below.

now
95%

of the working time. Now is projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index.

What the work is made of
  • 89%
  • 10%
  • 1%
  • 0%
  • 0%
17%

of the work: Anthropic's measure of what people already bring to Claude at work (2025). It counts help with part of a task, so it can be higher than the share within reach.

Half the desk work within reach
Already

On the chosen pace and reliability. Estimate.

Share of the working time within reach, now to 2030

0%25%50%75%100%2027202820292030NowDesk work: 99% of the time
Chosen to Ceiling: the share
DateNow
NowEnd of 2030
Change assumptionsLong-run pace, four in five

What each choice means: , , , , . Every pace starts from .

At this date and pace, models finish tasks up to 2.4 work days long four times in five.

What handing it over would take, now

The 95% within reach splits by what a model would need. The dates, pace and reliability follow the controls above. Estimates.

86%

of the working time. The material can be handed to a model and the result handed back.

9%

of the working time. The model has to be connected to the system the work lives in.

, not counted
1%

is conversation short enough by length. This site leaves conversation with people, so it is not in the total.

How far this has come

With GPT-4, measured in March 2023, 0% of this job's working time was within reach at . With Claude 3.7 Sonnet, measured in February 2025, 0%. With Claude Mythos Preview (early), measured in April 2026, 31%. Today's estimate: 95%.

0%25%50%75%100%2023202420252026GPT-4, March 2023: 0% within reachGPT-4 Turbo (Nov 2023), November 2023: 0% within reachGPT-4o, May 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.5 Sonnet (June 2024), June 2024: 0% within reacho1-preview, September 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024), October 2024: 0% within reacho1, December 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.7 Sonnet, February 2025: 0% within reacho3, April 2025: 1% within reachGPT-5, August 2025: 2% within reachGemini 3 Pro, November 2025: 4% within reachClaude Opus 4.5, November 2025: 4% within reachGPT-5.2, December 2025: 5% within reachClaude Opus 4.6, February 2026: 6% within reachClaude Mythos Preview (early), April 2026: 31% within reachToday (estimate), November 2026: 95% within reach
Each step is a new best model measured by METR, four in five; the dashed end is today's estimate. Point at a dot for the model.

A backcast: today's task data with the best model METR had measured by each date. It shows how fast the models have moved, not what anyone forecast at the time.

Measured use over time

Of the Claude.ai conversations Anthropic sampled and tied to a work task, 0.011% went to this job's tasks in May 2026, the 363rd largest of the 447 jobs that showed up at all; 1 of its 11 tasks showed up. Within each of Anthropic's methods, never across a change: 0.022% to 0.009% (released February and March 2025); 0.0028% to 0.011% (August 2025 to February 2026); 0.011% to 0.011% (April to May 2026).

0%0.025%0.05%20252026released February 2025: 0.022%released March 2025: 0.009%the week of Aug 4, 2025: 0.0028%the week of Nov 13, 2025: 0.0072%the week of Feb 5, 2026: 0.011%April 2026: 0.011%May 2026: 0.011%
Each dot is one release's sample. A line joins releases made by the same method; a change of method starts a new line. Point at a dot for its window.
Each release
ConversationsShareRankTasks seen
Released February 20250.022%435 of 7084 of 11
Released March 20250.009%523 of 7033 of 11
The week of Aug 4, 20250.0028%591 of 6551 of 11
The week of Nov 13, 20250.0072%526 of 6722 of 11
The week of Feb 5, 20260.011%483 of 6772 of 11
April 20260.011%347 of 4341 of 11
May 20260.011%363 of 4471 of 11

Measured, not estimated: Anthropic's samples of Claude.ai conversations, each tied by a model to an O*NET task, from the Anthropic Economic Index. It says where Claude's use goes, not how much of this job's working time it covers, so it is not on the same scale as the reach above. The releases differ in their sample, their classifier and the smallest share they report (the June 2026 file rounds each task to a hundredth of a percent, so a smaller task reads as none), which is why a change of method starts a new line. At least 96% of each older release's task-tied use matched this site's tasks, and all of the newest. Claude.ai only, so use through other tools and other companies' models is not in it. Every job ranked.

Robots and the physical work

Anthropic rates almost none of this job's working time as physical work, so robots do not reach it.

Anthropic's rating, not this site's estimate: Claude Opus 5, searching the web, rated each physical O*NET task by the kind of setting in which a robot it could cite (deployed, sold or demonstrated) does most of the task, weighted by its own estimate of each task's share of the time (What work can robots do?, September 30, 2026, data CC BY 4.0; every job ranked). A robot shown somewhere is not a robot in your building: cost, setup and safety decide that. The share within reach on this page still counts no body work. The robot behind each rated task is under the task below.

What changes for the people in this job

From the task-by-task review, by the end of 2028 on the long-run pace at four in five. It says which parts of the work stay with people and which change, not whether anyone keeps a job: that depends on decisions no data set can see.

What stays with people

1% of the working time: the conversation, in-person and hands-on parts of the tasks.

  • Exchange credit information with others, the conversation, 1%

What becomes checking the machine

98% of the working time: desk work a model could do by then, in tasks where a mistake costs something or a licensed person signs. A person checks it.

  • Analyze credit risk, costly if wrong, 23%
  • Complete loan applications for committee, costly if wrong, 19%
  • Compare borrowers with their peers, costly if wrong, 17%
  • Analyze expected loan profitability, costly if wrong, 16%
  • Write credit risk reports, costly if wrong, 15%
  • Generate financial ratios, costly if wrong, 5%

What to learn

  • Reviewing work you did not do yourself. The tasks under What becomes checking the machine, where a mistake costs something, stay a person's to check: spotting what a draft gets wrong is a skill of its own.
  • Briefing a model and checking its drafts. About 89% of the time is documents and data, the part models reach first: writing a clear brief, giving the right material, and checking what comes back.
  • Handling protected records. Much of the work touches protected personal records: knowing what may be shared with a model, and how, is part of the job.

Your own version of this job: read it against your job description. The headline is free; the full personal report, every task with its timeline and what to learn, is $19 (a sample).

The tasks

Sorted by . 11 tasks from .

Task
Analyze credit data and financial statements to determine the degree of risk involved in extending credit or lending money.Analysis of the statements and credit data to judge the risk.Done hourly or more by most who do it. AI observed on this task.23%2.5 h50 min to 6.7 hDocuments 100%96%Half by now
Complete loan applications, including credit analyses and summaries of loan requests, and submit to loan committees for approval.Writing up the analysis and summary and entering the application for the committee.Done daily by most who do it. 19%3.3 h1.3 h to 1 work dayDocuments 60%, systems 40%95%Half by now
Compare liquidity, profitability, and credit histories of establishments being evaluated with those of similar establishments in the same industries and geographic locations.Setting the borrower's figures beside those of similar firms in the same industry and place.Done daily by most who do it. 17%3.3 h1.3 h to 5 hDocuments 100%100%Half by now
Analyze financial data, such as income growth, quality of management, and market share to determine expected profitability of loans.Analysis of the borrower's growth, management and market to judge what the loan will earn.Done daily by most who do it. 16%2.5 h50 min to 6.7 hDocuments 100%96%Half by now
Prepare reports that include the degree of risk involved in extending credit or lending money.Writing the credit memo with the risk rating.Done daily by most who do it. 15%2.5 h50 min to 6.7 hDocuments 100%96%Half by now
Generate financial ratios, using computer programs, to evaluate customers' financial status.Spreading the statements in the program and reading the ratios it gives.Done daily by most who do it. 5%38 min13 min to 1.7 hDocuments 70%, systems 30%100%Half by now
Evaluate customer records and recommend payment plans, based on earnings, savings data, payment history, and purchase activity.Reading the customer's record and working out a plan they can pay.Done daily by most who do it.2%1.3 h25 min to 2.5 hDocuments 100%100%Half by now
Confer with credit association and other business representatives to exchange credit information.Calls with credit bureaus and other lenders about a customer's record.Done more than monthly by most who do it.1%50 min25 min to 1.7 hConversation 100%Stays with people
Review individual or commercial customer files to identify and select delinquent accounts for collection.Working through the account files in the system to pick which go to collection.Done more than yearly by most who do it.0.5%50 min25 min to 2.5 hDocuments 50%, systems 50%100%Half by now
Consult with customers to resolve complaints and verify financial and credit transactions.Calls with customers about complaints and transactions, checking the account as they talk.Done more than monthly by most who do it. 0.3%38 min13 min to 1.3 hConversation 70%, systems 30%30%Desk part half by now
Contact customers to collect payments on delinquent accounts.Calls to customers behind on payments, with the account noted as they go.Done more than monthly by most who do it.0.0%21 min8 min to 50 minConversation 70%, systems 30%30%Desk part half by now

Within reach, per task: the share of the task's time whose instances are short enough for a model to finish at the chosen date, pace and reliability. Half by: the date half of that time comes within reach. Made of: how the task's time splits among five kinds of doing. Only the documents and systems parts can count as within reach, so a task that is 30% documents can be at most 30% within reach.

Jobs that share skills with this one

From O*NET's related occupations. Within reach now and by the end of 2028, long-run pace, four in five.

Questions about this job

How much of the work of Credit Analysts is within reach of AI now?
An estimated 95% of the working time is within reach of AI models now and 99% by the end of 2028, on METR's long-run pace at four in five. Within reach means a model could finish work that long at that reliability. It is not a forecast of jobs lost or of savings.
Which tasks of Credit Analysts come within reach first?
Weighted by the time each takes, the tasks with the most within reach now (projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index) are: Analyze credit risk (96% of the task's time now); Complete loan applications for committee (95% of the task's time now, 100% by the end of 2028); and Compare borrowers with their peers (100% of the task's time now).
Which tasks of Credit Analysts stay with people?
Tasks that are people work or body work are not counted as within reach at any date. The largest: Exchange credit information with others. Together such tasks are about 1% of the working time, and the people and body parts of the other tasks stay with people too.
What should Credit Analysts learn as AI takes on more of the work?
By the job's own task-by-task review, the first things to learn are reviewing work you did not do yourself; briefing a model and checking its drafts; and handling protected records. By the end of 2028 on the long-run pace at four in five, about 1% of the working time stays with people, 98% becomes checking a model's work and 0% could be handed over with lighter checks. It says which parts of the work change, never whether anyone keeps a job.
Do people already use AI for the work of Credit Analysts?
In the Claude.ai conversations Anthropic sampled for May 2026 and tied to a work task, 0.011% went to this job's tasks, the 363rd largest share of the 447 jobs that showed up; 1 of its 11 tasks appeared. Anthropic's labor market measure puts the share of the job's tasks seen in real Claude use at work at 17%. These are measures of use, not of how much of the work AI could finish, and they cover Claude only.
Can robots do the physical work of Credit Analysts?
Anthropic's robot exposure rating (September 2026) finds almost none of the working time is physical work, so robots do not reach it.
How is this estimated?
From the 11 tasks O*NET lists for the occupation, each with an estimated length checked against GDPval and a share of the working time, reviewed one task at a time on October 2, 2026 for what each is made of (documents, business systems, conversation, in person, hands-on), and METR's measurements of how long a task the best AI models can finish, carried forward to the date from the latest, Claude Mythos Preview (early) in April 2026. Data checked November 10, 2026.

How the estimates are made

This job in your state or metro area
Embed these figures on your site

A small card with the share of working time within reach now and at the end of 2027, 2028 and 2030, the date and a link back. Free under CC BY 4.0; the card carries the credit.

See the card

Your own version of this job

The page above is the occupation. Your job is your title and what you actually do: give both, and they are read against these tasks in your browser, nothing sent anywhere. The headline is free: how much of your working time is within reach now and by the end of 2028, and how many of the tasks your description names.

The full personal report is $19, to print or save as a PDF: every task with when it comes within reach, which ones your description names, the parts of your description the task list does not cover, what stays with you, what becomes checking the machine and what to learn.