Skip to content
STRATUSWORKFORCE SCAN

Web Administrators

In short: today's best AI models could do about 72% of this job's working time (projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index) if the work were set up for them, and about 86% by the end of 2028 if progress keeps its long-run pace. The people and hands-on work, about 14% of the time, stays with people.

Compare with another job

Manage web environment design, deployment, development and maintenance activities. Perform testing and quality assurance of web sites and web applications.

$116,580 a year (for the broader BLS group this job sits in).

A typical 40-hour week

Not yet reviewed task by task
  • AI could take on29 h
  • A person checks AI's work0 h
  • Desk work AI can't do yet5 h
  • Stays with people6 h

Web Administrators, now: of a 40-hour week, AI could take on 29 hours, 0 hours become checking its work, 5 hours are desk work it can't do yet, and 6 hours stay with people.

The largest pieces: Determine sources of Web page or server problems, and take action to correct such problems (about 3 h); Gather, analyze, or document user feedback to locate or resolve sources of problems (about 2 h); Identify or address interoperability requirements (about 2 h).

Estimates for a typical week of this job, if progress keeps its long-run pace, counting work the best models finish four times in five. Every task is below.

now
72%

of the working time. Now is projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index.

Kinds of work
  • 86%
  • 14%
  • 1%
31%

of the work: Anthropic's measure of what people already bring to Claude at work (2025). It counts help with part of a task, so it can be higher than the share within reach.

Half the desk work within reach
Already

On the chosen pace and reliability. Estimate.

Share of the working time within reach, now to 2030

0%25%50%75%100%2027202820292030NowDesk work: 86% of the time
Chosen to Ceiling: the share
DateNow
NowEnd of 2030
Change assumptionsLong-run pace, four in five

What each choice means: , , , , . Every pace starts from .

At this date and pace, models finish tasks up to 2.4 work days long four times in five.

How far this has come

With GPT-4, measured in March 2023, 0% of this job's working time was within reach at . With Claude 3.7 Sonnet, measured in February 2025, 0%. With Claude Mythos Preview (early), measured in April 2026, 23%. Today's estimate: 72%.

0%25%50%75%2023202420252026GPT-4, March 2023: 0% within reachGPT-4 Turbo (Nov 2023), November 2023: 0% within reachGPT-4o, May 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.5 Sonnet (June 2024), June 2024: 0% within reacho1-preview, September 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024), October 2024: 0% within reacho1, December 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.7 Sonnet, February 2025: 0% within reacho3, April 2025: 1% within reachGPT-5, August 2025: 2% within reachGemini 3 Pro, November 2025: 4% within reachClaude Opus 4.5, November 2025: 4% within reachGPT-5.2, December 2025: 6% within reachClaude Opus 4.6, February 2026: 6% within reachClaude Mythos Preview (early), April 2026: 23% within reachToday (estimate), November 2026: 72% within reach
Each step is a new best model measured by METR, four in five; the dashed end is today's estimate. Point at a dot for the model.

A backcast: today's task data with the best model METR had measured by each date. It shows how fast the models have moved, not what anyone forecast at the time.

Measured use over time

Of the Claude.ai conversations Anthropic sampled and tied to a work task, 0.24% went to this job's tasks in May 2026, the 91st largest of the 447 jobs that showed up at all; 8 of its 35 tasks showed up. Within each of Anthropic's methods, never across a change: 1.1% to 1.1% (released February and March 2025); 0.55% to 0.78% (August 2025 to February 2026); 0.23% to 0.24% (April to May 2026).

0%1%2%20252026released February 2025: 1.1%released March 2025: 1.1%the week of Aug 4, 2025: 0.55%the week of Nov 13, 2025: 0.68%the week of Feb 5, 2026: 0.78%April 2026: 0.23%May 2026: 0.24%
Each dot is one release's sample. A line joins releases made by the same method; a change of method starts a new line. Point at a dot for its window.
Each release
ConversationsShareRankTasks seen
Released February 20251.1%16 of 70811 of 35
Released March 20251.1%12 of 70314 of 35
The week of Aug 4, 20250.55%39 of 65512 of 35
The week of Nov 13, 20250.68%28 of 67212 of 35
The week of Feb 5, 20260.78%26 of 67712 of 35
April 20260.23%89 of 4347 of 35
May 20260.24%91 of 4478 of 35

Measured, not estimated: Anthropic's samples of Claude.ai conversations, each tied by a model to an O*NET task, from the Anthropic Economic Index. It says where Claude's use goes, not how much of this job's working time it covers, so it is not on the same scale as the reach above. The releases differ in their sample, their classifier and the smallest share they report (the June 2026 file rounds each task to a hundredth of a percent, so a smaller task reads as none), which is why a change of method starts a new line. At least 96% of each older release's task-tied use matched this site's tasks, and all of the newest. Claude.ai only, so use through other tools and other companies' models is not in it. Every job ranked.

Robots and the physical work

Anthropic rates almost none of this job's working time as physical work, so robots do not reach it.

Anthropic's rating, not this site's estimate: Claude Opus 5, searching the web, rated each physical O*NET task by the kind of setting in which a robot it could cite (deployed, sold or demonstrated) does most of the task, weighted by its own estimate of each task's share of the time (What work can robots do?, September 30, 2026, data CC BY 4.0; every job ranked). A robot shown somewhere is not a robot in your building: cost, setup and safety decide that. The share within reach on this page still counts no body work. The robot behind each rated task is under the task below.

The tasks

Sorted by . 35 tasks from .

TaskKind
Collaborate with Web developers to create and operate internal and external Web sites, or to manage projects, such as e-marketing campaigns.Done more than monthly by most who do it. 10%3.3 h50 min to 1.7 work daysStays with people
Determine sources of Web page or server problems, and take action to correct such problems.Done daily by most who do it. AI observed on this task.8%1.7 h25 min to 6.7 h88%Half by now
Gather, analyze, or document user feedback to locate or resolve sources of problems.Done more than monthly by most who do it. AI observed on this task.6%2.5 h50 min to 6.7 h96%Half by now
Identify or address interoperability requirements.Done more than monthly by most who do it. 6%3.3 h50 min to 1.3 work days80%Half by now
Develop and implement marketing plans for home pages, including print advertising or advertisement rotation.Done more than yearly by most who do it. 5%1 work day2.5 h to 4.2 work days43%Half by Dec 2026
Track, compile, and analyze Web site usage data.Done more than monthly by most who do it. AI observed on this task.5%2.5 h38 min to 6.7 h91%Half by now
Correct testing-identified problems, or recommend actions for their resolution.Done daily by most who do it. 4%1.7 h25 min to 6.7 h88%Half by now
Develop or implement procedures for ongoing Web site revision.Done more than yearly by most who do it. AI observed on this task.4%3.3 h50 min to 6.7 h91%Half by now
Review or update Web page content or links in a timely manner, using appropriate tools.Done daily by most who do it. AI observed on this task.4%50 min17 min to 2.5 h100%Half by now
Collaborate with development teams to discuss, analyze, or resolve usability issues.Done more than monthly by most who do it. 4%1.7 h38 min to 5 hStays with people
Develop or document style guidelines for Web site content.Done more than yearly by most who do it. AI observed on this task.4%5 h1.7 h to 2.1 work days73%Half by now
Monitor systems for intrusions or denial of service attacks, and report security breaches to appropriate personnel.Done daily by most who do it. AI observed on this task.3%38 min13 min to 2.5 h100%Half by now

Within reach, per task: the share of the task's time whose instances are short enough for a model to finish at the chosen date, pace and reliability. Half by: the date half of that time comes within reach.

Jobs that share skills with this one

From O*NET's related occupations. Within reach now and by the end of 2028, long-run pace, four in five.

Where this job works

The industry groups that employ the most of it (BLS, May 2025). Counts are for the broader BLS group this job sits in.

Where the most of these jobs are

The metro areas with the most people in it (BLS, May 2025). Counts are for the broader BLS group this job sits in.

Questions about this job

How much of the work of Web Administrators is within reach of AI now?
An estimated 72% of the working time is within reach of AI models now and 86% by the end of 2028, on METR's long-run pace at four in five (85% to 86% across the three paces the site shows). Within reach means a model could finish work that long at that reliability. It is not a forecast of jobs lost or of savings.
Which tasks of Web Administrators come within reach first?
Weighted by the time each takes, the tasks with the most within reach now (projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index) are: Determine sources of Web page or server problems, and take action to correct such problems (88% of the task's time now, 100% by the end of 2028); Gather, analyze, or document user feedback to locate or resolve sources of problems (96% of the task's time now); and Identify or address interoperability requirements (80% of the task's time now, 100% by the end of 2028).
Which tasks of Web Administrators stay with people?
Tasks that are people work or body work are not counted as within reach at any date. The largest: Collaborate with Web developers to create and operate internal and external Web sites, or to manage projects, such as e-marketing campaigns; Collaborate with development teams to discuss, analyze, or resolve usability issues; and Install or configure Web server software or hardware to ensure that directory structure is well-defined, logical, and secure, and that files are named properly. Together such tasks are about 14% of the working time.
Do people already use AI for the work of Web Administrators?
In the Claude.ai conversations Anthropic sampled for May 2026 and tied to a work task, 0.24% went to this job's tasks, the 91st largest share of the 447 jobs that showed up; 8 of its 35 tasks appeared. Anthropic's labor market measure puts the share of the job's tasks seen in real Claude use at work at 31%. These are measures of use, not of how much of the work AI could finish, and they cover Claude only.
Can robots do the physical work of Web Administrators?
Anthropic's robot exposure rating (September 2026) finds almost none of the working time is physical work, so robots do not reach it.
How is this estimated?
From the 35 tasks O*NET lists for the occupation, each with an estimated length checked against GDPval and a share of the working time, each classed as desk, people or body work, and METR's measurements of how long a task the best AI models can finish, carried forward to the date from the latest, Claude Mythos Preview (early) in April 2026. Data checked November 10, 2026.

How the estimates are made

This job in your state or metro area
Embed these figures on your site

A small card with the share of working time within reach now and at the end of 2027, 2028 and 2030, the date and a link back. Free under CC BY 4.0; the card carries the credit.

See the card

Your own version of this job

The page above is the occupation. Your job is your title and what you actually do: give both, and they are read against these tasks in your browser, nothing sent anywhere. The headline is free: how much of your working time is within reach now and by the end of 2028, and how many of the tasks your description names.

This occupation has not been reviewed task by task yet, so the full personal report is not offered for it; 402 of 923 occupations are reviewed so far, largest first.