Skip to content
STRATUSWORKFORCE SCAN

Proofreaders and Copy Markers

In short: today's best AI models could do about 91% of this job's working time (projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index) if the work were set up for them, and about the same by the end of 2028 if progress keeps its long-run pace. The people and hands-on work, about 9% of the time, stays with people.

Compare with another job

Read transcript or proof type setup to detect and mark for correction any grammatical, typographical, or compositional errors. Excludes workers whose primary duty is editing copy. Includes proofreaders of braille.

4,580 people do this job in the US. $51,120 a year.

A typical 40-hour week

Not yet reviewed task by task
  • AI could take on36 h
  • A person checks AI's work0 h
  • Desk work AI can't do yet0 h
  • Stays with people4 h

Proofreaders and Copy Markers, now: of a 40-hour week, AI could take on 36 hours, 0 hours become checking its work, 0 hours are desk work it can't do yet, and 4 hours stay with people.

The largest pieces: Mark copy to indicate and correct errors in type, arrangement, grammar, punctuation, or spelling, using standard printers' marks (about 8 h); Archive documents, conduct research, and read copy, using the internet and various computer programs (about 5 h); Typeset and measure dimensions, spacing, and positioning of page elements, such as copy and illustrations, to verify conformance to specifications, using printer's ruler or layout software (about 5 h).

Estimates for a typical week of this job, if progress keeps its long-run pace, counting work the best models finish four times in five. Every task is below.

now
91%

of the working time. Now is projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index.

Kinds of work
  • 91%
  • 9%
  • 0%
18%

of the work: Anthropic's measure of what people already bring to Claude at work (2025). It counts help with part of a task, so it can be higher than the share within reach.

Half the desk work within reach
Already

On the chosen pace and reliability. Estimate.

Share of the working time within reach, now to 2030

0%25%50%75%100%2027202820292030NowDesk work: 91% of the time
Chosen to Ceiling: the share
DateNow
NowEnd of 2030
Change assumptionsLong-run pace, four in five

What each choice means: , , , , . Every pace starts from .

At this date and pace, models finish tasks up to 2.4 work days long four times in five.

How far this has come

With GPT-4, measured in March 2023, 0% of this job's working time was within reach at . With Claude 3.7 Sonnet, measured in February 2025, 3%. With Claude Mythos Preview (early), measured in April 2026, 74%. Today's estimate: 91%.

0%25%50%75%100%2023202420252026GPT-4, March 2023: 0% within reachGPT-4 Turbo (Nov 2023), November 2023: 0% within reachGPT-4o, May 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.5 Sonnet (June 2024), June 2024: 0% within reacho1-preview, September 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024), October 2024: 0% within reacho1, December 2024: 1% within reachClaude 3.7 Sonnet, February 2025: 3% within reacho3, April 2025: 14% within reachGPT-5, August 2025: 20% within reachGemini 3 Pro, November 2025: 31% within reachClaude Opus 4.5, November 2025: 31% within reachGPT-5.2, December 2025: 38% within reachClaude Opus 4.6, February 2026: 41% within reachClaude Mythos Preview (early), April 2026: 74% within reachToday (estimate), November 2026: 91% within reach
Each step is a new best model measured by METR, four in five; the dashed end is today's estimate. Point at a dot for the model.

A backcast: today's task data with the best model METR had measured by each date. It shows how fast the models have moved, not what anyone forecast at the time.

Measured use over time

Of the Claude.ai conversations Anthropic sampled and tied to a work task, 0.42% went to this job's tasks in May 2026, the 58th largest of the 447 jobs that showed up at all; 3 of its 11 tasks showed up. Within each of Anthropic's methods, never across a change: 0.035% to 0.034% (released February and March 2025); 0.025% to 0.057% (August 2025 to February 2026); 0.43% to 0.42% (April to May 2026).

0%0.25%0.5%20252026released February 2025: 0.035%released March 2025: 0.034%the week of Aug 4, 2025: 0.025%the week of Nov 13, 2025: 0.048%the week of Feb 5, 2026: 0.057%April 2026: 0.43%May 2026: 0.42%
Each dot is one release's sample. A line joins releases made by the same method; a change of method starts a new line. Point at a dot for its window.
Each release
ConversationsShareRankTasks seen
Released February 20250.035%333 of 7083 of 11
Released March 20250.034%337 of 7033 of 11
The week of Aug 4, 20250.025%341 of 6551 of 11
The week of Nov 13, 20250.048%244 of 6721 of 11
The week of Feb 5, 20260.057%237 of 6771 of 11
April 20260.43%55 of 4343 of 11
May 20260.42%58 of 4473 of 11

Measured, not estimated: Anthropic's samples of Claude.ai conversations, each tied by a model to an O*NET task, from the Anthropic Economic Index. It says where Claude's use goes, not how much of this job's working time it covers, so it is not on the same scale as the reach above. The releases differ in their sample, their classifier and the smallest share they report (the June 2026 file rounds each task to a hundredth of a percent, so a smaller task reads as none), which is why a change of method starts a new line. At least 96% of each older release's task-tied use matched this site's tasks, and all of the newest. Claude.ai only, so use through other tools and other companies' models is not in it. Every job ranked.

Robots and the physical work

Anthropic rates almost none of this job's working time as physical work, so robots do not reach it.

Anthropic's rating, not this site's estimate: Claude Opus 5, searching the web, rated each physical O*NET task by the kind of setting in which a robot it could cite (deployed, sold or demonstrated) does most of the task, weighted by its own estimate of each task's share of the time (What work can robots do?, September 30, 2026, data CC BY 4.0; every job ranked). A robot shown somewhere is not a robot in your building: cost, setup and safety decide that. The share within reach on this page still counts no body work. The robot behind each rated task is under the task below.

The tasks

Sorted by . 11 tasks from .

TaskKind
Mark copy to indicate and correct errors in type, arrangement, grammar, punctuation, or spelling, using standard printers' marks.Done hourly or more by most who do it. AI observed on this task.19%38 min13 min to 2.5 h100%Half by now
Archive documents, conduct research, and read copy, using the internet and various computer programs.Done daily by most who do it. 14%1.1 h25 min to 2.5 h100%Half by now
Write original content, such as headlines, cutlines, captions, and cover copy.Done hourly or more by most who do it. 13%50 min13 min to 3.3 h97%Half by now
Typeset and measure dimensions, spacing, and positioning of page elements, such as copy and illustrations, to verify conformance to specifications, using printer's ruler or layout software.Done hourly or more by most who do it.13%50 min17 min to 1.7 h100%Half by now
Compare information or figures on one record against same data on other records, or with original copy, to detect errors.Done hourly or more by most who do it. 10%33 min13 min to 1.7 h100%Half by now
Correct or record omissions, errors, or inconsistencies found.Done hourly or more by most who do it. 9%21 min8 min to 1.1 h100%Half by now
Read corrected copies or proofs to ensure that all corrections have been made.Done hourly or more by most who do it. 9%25 min8 min to 1.3 h100%Half by now
Consult reference books or secure aid of readers to check references with rules of grammar and composition.Done daily by most who do it. 5%21 min8 min to 50 minStays with people
Consult with authors and editors regarding manuscript changes and suggestions.Done daily by most who do it. 4%38 min13 min to 1.3 hStays with people
Route proofs with marked corrections to authors, editors, typists, or typesetters for correction or reprinting.Done hourly or more by most who do it. 3%8 min4 min to 21 min100%Half by now
Read proof sheets aloud, calling out punctuation marks and spelling unusual words and proper names.Done daily by most who do it.2%50 min13 min to 2.5 h99%Half by now

Within reach, per task: the share of the task's time whose instances are short enough for a model to finish at the chosen date, pace and reliability. Half by: the date half of that time comes within reach.

Jobs that share skills with this one

From O*NET's related occupations. Within reach now and by the end of 2028, long-run pace, four in five.

Questions about this job

How much of the work of Proofreaders and Copy Markers is within reach of AI now?
An estimated 91% of the working time is within reach of AI models now and 91% by the end of 2028, on METR's long-run pace at four in five. Within reach means a model could finish work that long at that reliability. It is not a forecast of jobs lost or of savings.
Which tasks of Proofreaders and Copy Markers come within reach first?
Weighted by the time each takes, the tasks with the most within reach now (projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index) are: Mark copy to indicate and correct errors in type, arrangement, grammar, punctuation, or spelling, using standard printers' marks (100% of the task's time now); Archive documents, conduct research, and read copy, using the internet and various computer programs (100% of the task's time now); and Typeset and measure dimensions, spacing, and positioning of page elements, such as copy and illustrations, to verify conformance to specifications, using printer's ruler or layout software (100% of the task's time now).
Which tasks of Proofreaders and Copy Markers stay with people?
Tasks that are people work or body work are not counted as within reach at any date. The largest: Consult reference books or secure aid of readers to check references with rules of grammar and composition; and Consult with authors and editors regarding manuscript changes and suggestions. Together such tasks are about 9% of the working time.
Do people already use AI for the work of Proofreaders and Copy Markers?
In the Claude.ai conversations Anthropic sampled for May 2026 and tied to a work task, 0.42% went to this job's tasks, the 58th largest share of the 447 jobs that showed up; 3 of its 11 tasks appeared. Anthropic's labor market measure puts the share of the job's tasks seen in real Claude use at work at 18%. These are measures of use, not of how much of the work AI could finish, and they cover Claude only.
Can robots do the physical work of Proofreaders and Copy Markers?
Anthropic's robot exposure rating (September 2026) finds almost none of the working time is physical work, so robots do not reach it.
How is this estimated?
From the 11 tasks O*NET lists for the occupation, each with an estimated length checked against GDPval and a share of the working time, each classed as desk, people or body work, and METR's measurements of how long a task the best AI models can finish, carried forward to the date from the latest, Claude Mythos Preview (early) in April 2026. Data checked November 10, 2026.

How the estimates are made

This job in your state or metro area
Embed these figures on your site

A small card with the share of working time within reach now and at the end of 2027, 2028 and 2030, the date and a link back. Free under CC BY 4.0; the card carries the credit.

See the card

Your own version of this job

The page above is the occupation. Your job is your title and what you actually do: give both, and they are read against these tasks in your browser, nothing sent anywhere. The headline is free: how much of your working time is within reach now and by the end of 2028, and how many of the tasks your description names.

This occupation has not been reviewed task by task yet, so the full personal report is not offered for it; 402 of 923 occupations are reviewed so far, largest first.