Skip to content
STRATUSWORKFORCE SCAN

Amusement and Recreation Attendants

In short: today's best AI models could do about 16% of this job's working time (projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index) if the work were set up for them, and about the same by the end of 2028 if progress keeps its long-run pace. The conversations, in-person and hands-on work, about 84% of the time, stays with people.

Compare with another job

Perform a variety of attending duties at amusement or recreation facility. May schedule use of recreation facilities, maintain and provide equipment to participants of sporting events or recreational pursuits, or operate amusement concessions and rides.

397,830 people do this job in the US. $32,150 a year.

Reviewed on September 30, 2026: what each task is made of, and what handing it over would ask.

A typical 40-hour week

  • AI could take on5 h
  • A person checks AI's work1 h
  • Desk work AI can't do yet0 h
  • Stays with people34 h

Amusement and Recreation Attendants, now: of a 40-hour week, AI could take on 5 hours, 1 hours become checking its work, 0 hours are desk work it can't do yet, and 34 hours stay with people.

The largest pieces: Record attendance and sales (about 4 h); Know the emergency procedures (about 1 h, a person checks); Schedule courts and lanes (under an hour).

Estimates for a typical week of this job, if progress keeps its long-run pace, counting work the best models finish four times in five. Every task is below.

now
16%

of the working time. Now is projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index.

What the work is made of
  • 4%
  • 12%
  • 1%
  • 31%
  • 52%
6%

of the work: Anthropic's measure of what people already bring to Claude at work (2025). It counts help with part of a task, so it can be higher than the share within reach.

Half the desk work within reach
Already

On the chosen pace and reliability. Estimate.

Share of the working time within reach, now to 2030

0%25%50%75%100%2027202820292030NowDesk work: 16% of the time
Chosen to Ceiling: the share
DateNow
NowEnd of 2030
Change assumptionsLong-run pace, four in five

What each choice means: , , , , . Every pace starts from .

At this date and pace, models finish tasks up to 2.4 work days long four times in five.

What handing it over would take, now

The 16% within reach splits by what a model would need. The dates, pace and reliability follow the controls above. Estimates.

4%

of the working time. The material can be handed to a model and the result handed back.

12%

of the working time. The model has to be connected to the system the work lives in.

, not counted
1%

is conversation short enough by length. This site leaves conversation with people, so it is not in the total.

How far this has come

With GPT-4, measured in March 2023, 0% of this job's working time was within reach at . With Claude 3.7 Sonnet, measured in February 2025, 2%. With Claude Mythos Preview (early), measured in April 2026, 16%. Today's estimate: 16%.

0%5%10%15%20%2023202420252026GPT-4, March 2023: 0% within reachGPT-4 Turbo (Nov 2023), November 2023: 0% within reachGPT-4o, May 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.5 Sonnet (June 2024), June 2024: 0% within reacho1-preview, September 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024), October 2024: 0% within reacho1, December 2024: 1% within reachClaude 3.7 Sonnet, February 2025: 2% within reacho3, April 2025: 9% within reachGPT-5, August 2025: 11% within reachGemini 3 Pro, November 2025: 13% within reachClaude Opus 4.5, November 2025: 13% within reachGPT-5.2, December 2025: 14% within reachClaude Opus 4.6, February 2026: 14% within reachClaude Mythos Preview (early), April 2026: 16% within reachToday (estimate), November 2026: 16% within reach
Each step is a new best model measured by METR, four in five; the dashed end is today's estimate. Point at a dot for the model.

A backcast: today's task data with the best model METR had measured by each date. It shows how fast the models have moved, not what anyone forecast at the time.

Measured use over time

Of the Claude.ai conversations Anthropic sampled and tied to a work task, no reportable share went to this job's tasks in May 2026; 0 of its 17 tasks showed up. Within each of Anthropic's methods, never across a change: 0.011% to 0.019% (released February and March 2025); 0.0038% to 0.023% (August 2025 to February 2026).

0%0.025%0.05%20252026released February 2025: 0.011%released March 2025: 0.019%the week of Aug 4, 2025: 0.0038%the week of Nov 13, 2025: 0.014%the week of Feb 5, 2026: 0.023%April 2026: noneMay 2026: none
Each dot is one release's sample. A line joins releases made by the same method; a change of method starts a new line. Point at a dot for its window.
Each release
ConversationsShareRankTasks seen
Released February 20250.011%525 of 7081 of 17
Released March 20250.019%430 of 7031 of 17
The week of Aug 4, 20250.0038%561 of 6551 of 17
The week of Nov 13, 20250.014%432 of 6721 of 17
The week of Feb 5, 20260.023%379 of 6771 of 17
April 2026nonen/a0 of 17
May 2026nonen/a0 of 17

Measured, not estimated: Anthropic's samples of Claude.ai conversations, each tied by a model to an O*NET task, from the Anthropic Economic Index. It says where Claude's use goes, not how much of this job's working time it covers, so it is not on the same scale as the reach above. The releases differ in their sample, their classifier and the smallest share they report (the June 2026 file rounds each task to a hundredth of a percent, so a smaller task reads as none), which is why a change of method starts a new line. At least 96% of each older release's task-tied use matched this site's tasks, and all of the newest. Claude.ai only, so use through other tools and other companies' models is not in it. Every job ranked.

Robots and the physical work

Anthropic rates 52% of this job's working time as physical work. For 35% of the working time, a robot has been shown doing most of the task somewhere: 9% in a purpose-built cell, 26% in a structured facility. 0.61 of 3, the 279th highest of the 923 jobs.

  • Not physical 48%
  • No robot shown 17%
  • In a purpose-built cell 9%
  • In a structured facility 26%

Anthropic's rating, not this site's estimate: Claude Opus 5, searching the web, rated each physical O*NET task by the kind of setting in which a robot it could cite (deployed, sold or demonstrated) does most of the task, weighted by its own estimate of each task's share of the time (What work can robots do?, September 30, 2026, data CC BY 4.0; every job ranked). A robot shown somewhere is not a robot in your building: cost, setup and safety decide that. The share within reach on this page still counts no body work. The robot behind each rated task is under the task below.

What changes for the people in this job

From the task-by-task review, by the end of 2028 on the long-run pace at four in five. It says which parts of the work stay with people and which change, not whether anyone keeps a job: that depends on decisions no data set can see.

What stays with people

84% of the working time: the conversation, in-person and hands-on parts of the tasks.

  • Store and set up equipment, the hands-on work, 16%
  • Watch for safety and order, the in-person work, 13%
  • Inspect and maintain equipment, the hands-on work, 8%
  • Clean rides and grounds, the hands-on work, 8%
  • Operate the rides, the hands-on work, 6%
  • Tell patrons about the facilities, the in-person work, 6%

What becomes checking the machine

4% of the working time: desk work a model could do by then, in tasks where a mistake costs something or a licensed person signs. A person checks it. Another 12% is desk work that is small if wrong, which can be handed over with lighter checks.

  • Know the emergency procedures, severe if wrong, 4%

What to learn

  • The hands-on craft. About 52% of the time is hands-on work, which no model here does; robots are rated separately on this page.
  • Judgment where errors are severe. Some tasks are severe if wrong. Knowing when not to trust an output matters more there than speed.
  • The conversations. About 32% of the time is conversation and in-person work, which this site leaves with people: listening, explaining, persuading, calming.
  • Dealing with people outside the organization. Customers, patients, suppliers or the public: trust with them is built by a person.
  • Running AI inside the business systems. About 12% of the time is work inside business systems, which a model can do only once it is connected: knowing the systems well enough to set that up and watch it.

Your own version of this job: read it against your job description. The headline is free; the full personal report, every task with its timeline and what to learn, is $19 (a sample).

The tasks

Sorted by . 17 tasks from .

Task
Maintain inventories of equipment, storing and retrieving items and assembling and disassembling equipment as necessary.Fetching, putting away and assembling gear.Done daily by most who do it. Robots: in a purpose-built cell, AutoCrib industrial vending systems (Snap-on AutoCrib); CribMaster (Stanley Black & Decker) (sold). Anthropic's rating.16%38 min17 min to 1.7 hHands-on 100%Stays with people
Monitor activities to ensure adherence to rules and safety procedures, or arrange for the removal of unruly patrons.Keeping an eye on the crowd and stepping in when needed.Done daily by most who do it. 13%13 min4 min to 38 minIn person 60%, hands-on 40%Stays with people
Record details of attendance, sales, receipts, reservations, or repair activities.Entries in the log or the system.Done daily by most who do it. 11%13 min4 min to 33 minSystems 100%100%Half by now
Inspect equipment to detect wear and damage and perform minor repairs, adjustments, or maintenance tasks, such as oiling parts.Looking rides and gear over and doing small repairs.Done more than monthly by most who do it.Robots: no robot shown. Anthropic's rating.8%25 min13 min to 50 minHands-on 100%Stays with people
Clean sporting equipment, vehicles, rides, booths, facilities, or grounds.Cleaning by hand.Done daily by most who do it.Robots: in a structured facility, Avidbots Neo / Neo 2W (deployed). Anthropic's rating.8%25 min13 min to 1.3 hHands-on 100%Stays with people
Keep informed of shut-down and emergency evacuation procedures.Reading and drilling the evacuation steps; the knowing is the attendant's own.Done daily by most who do it. 7%25 min13 min to 50 minDocuments 50%, in person 50%50%Desk part half by now
Operate, drive, or explain the use of mechanical riding devices or other automatic equipment in amusement parks, carnivals, or recreation areas.Running the ride from its controls with patrons aboard.Done more than monthly by most who do it.Robots: no robot shown. Anthropic's rating.6%25 min8 min to 1.3 hHands-on 80%, in person 20%Stays with people
Provide information about facilities, entertainment options, and rules and regulations.Answering questions in person.Done daily by most who do it. AI observed on this task.6%4 min2 min to 8 minIn person 100%Stays with people
Sell tickets and collect fees from customers.A register sale at the booth.Done hourly or more by most who do it. 5%4 min3 min to 8 minHands-on 70%, in person 30%Stays with people
Announce or describe amusement park attractions to patrons to entice customers to games and other entertainment.Patter to the crowd at the game or the ride.Done hourly or more by most who do it.4%7 min3 min to 17 minIn person 100%Stays with people
Direct patrons to rides, seats, or attractions.Pointing the way in person.Done hourly or more by most who do it. 4%3 min2 min to 4 minIn person 100%Stays with people
Provide assistance to patrons entering or exiting amusement rides, boats, or ski lifts, or mounting or dismounting animals.A hand for patrons getting on and off the ride.Done hourly or more by most who do it.Robots: no robot shown. Anthropic's rating.3%4 min2 min to 8 minHands-on 70%, in person 30%Stays with people

Within reach, per task: the share of the task's time whose instances are short enough for a model to finish at the chosen date, pace and reliability. Half by: the date half of that time comes within reach. Made of: how the task's time splits among five kinds of doing. Only the documents and systems parts can count as within reach, so a task that is 30% documents can be at most 30% within reach.

Jobs that share skills with this one

From O*NET's related occupations. Within reach now and by the end of 2028, long-run pace, four in five.

Where this job works

The industry groups that employ the most of it (BLS, May 2025).

Where the most of these jobs are

The metro areas with the most people in it (BLS, May 2025).

Questions about this job

How much of the work of Amusement and Recreation Attendants is within reach of AI now?
An estimated 16% of the working time is within reach of AI models now and 16% by the end of 2028, on METR's long-run pace at four in five. Within reach means a model could finish work that long at that reliability. It is not a forecast of jobs lost or of savings.
Which tasks of Amusement and Recreation Attendants come within reach first?
Weighted by the time each takes, the tasks with the most within reach now (projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index) are: Record attendance and sales (100% of the task's time now); Know the emergency procedures (50% of the task's time now); and Schedule courts and lanes (70% of the task's time now).
Which tasks of Amusement and Recreation Attendants stay with people?
Tasks that are people work or body work are not counted as within reach at any date. The largest: Store and set up equipment; Watch for safety and order; and Inspect and maintain equipment. Together such tasks are about 80% of the working time, and the people and body parts of the other tasks stay with people too.
What should Amusement and Recreation Attendants learn as AI takes on more of the work?
By the job's own task-by-task review, the first things to learn are the hands-on craft; judgment where errors are severe; and the conversations. By the end of 2028 on the long-run pace at four in five, about 84% of the working time stays with people, 4% becomes checking a model's work and 12% could be handed over with lighter checks. It says which parts of the work change, never whether anyone keeps a job.
Do people already use AI for the work of Amusement and Recreation Attendants?
In the Claude.ai conversations Anthropic sampled for May 2026, no reportable share went to this job's tasks. Anthropic's labor market measure puts the share of the job's tasks seen in real Claude use at work at 6%. These are measures of use, not of how much of the work AI could finish, and they cover Claude only.
Can robots do the physical work of Amusement and Recreation Attendants?
Anthropic's robot exposure rating (September 2026) finds 52% of the working time is physical work, and that a robot has been shown doing most of the task, somewhere, for 35% of the working time, 26% in a structured facility. Its index is 0.61 of 3. One example: Avidbots Neo / Neo 2W for "clean rides and grounds". A robot shown somewhere is not one in every workplace; this site's own estimates still count no physical work as within reach.
How is this estimated?
From the 17 tasks O*NET lists for the occupation, each with an estimated length checked against GDPval and a share of the working time, reviewed one task at a time on September 30, 2026 for what each is made of (documents, business systems, conversation, in person, hands-on), and METR's measurements of how long a task the best AI models can finish, carried forward to the date from the latest, Claude Mythos Preview (early) in April 2026. Data checked November 10, 2026.

How the estimates are made

This job in your state or metro area
Embed these figures on your site

A small card with the share of working time within reach now and at the end of 2027, 2028 and 2030, the date and a link back. Free under CC BY 4.0; the card carries the credit.

See the card

Your own version of this job

The page above is the occupation. Your job is your title and what you actually do: give both, and they are read against these tasks in your browser, nothing sent anywhere. The headline is free: how much of your working time is within reach now and by the end of 2028, and how many of the tasks your description names.

The full personal report is $19, to print or save as a PDF: every task with when it comes within reach, which ones your description names, the parts of your description the task list does not cover, what stays with you, what becomes checking the machine and what to learn.