Skip to content
STRATUSWORKFORCE SCAN

Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians

In short: today's best AI models could do about 39% of this job's working time (projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index) if the work were set up for them, and about 48% by the end of 2028 if progress keeps its long-run pace. The conversations, in-person and hands-on work, about 52% of the time, stays with people.

Compare with another job

Apply electrical and electronic theory and related knowledge, usually under the direction of engineering staff, to design, build, repair, adjust, and modify electrical components, circuitry, controls, and machinery for subsequent evaluation and use by engineering staff in making engineering design decisions.

95,130 people do this job in the US. $78,190 a year.

Reviewed on September 30, 2026: what each task is made of, and what handing it over would ask.

A typical 40-hour week

  • AI could take on2 h
  • A person checks AI's work13 h
  • Desk work AI can't do yet4 h
  • Stays with people21 h

Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians, now: of a 40-hour week, AI could take on 2 hours, 13 hours become checking its work, 4 hours are desk work it can't do yet, and 21 hours stay with people.

The largest pieces: Review plans against codes (about 3 h, a person checks); Produce electronics drawings (about 2 h, a person checks); Conduct cost studies (about 2 h).

Estimates for a typical week of this job, if progress keeps its long-run pace, counting work the best models finish four times in five. Every task is below.

now
39%

of the working time. Now is projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index.

What the work is made of
  • 45%
  • 3%
  • 2%
  • 7%
  • 43%
2%

of the work: Anthropic's measure of what people already bring to Claude at work (2025). It counts help with part of a task, so it can be higher than the share within reach.

Half the desk work within reach
Already

On the chosen pace and reliability. Estimate.

Share of the working time within reach, now to 2030

0%25%50%75%100%2027202820292030NowDesk work: 48% of the time
Chosen to Ceiling: the share
DateNow
NowEnd of 2030
Change assumptionsLong-run pace, four in five

What each choice means: , , , , . Every pace starts from .

At this date and pace, models finish tasks up to 2.4 work days long four times in five.

What handing it over would take, now

The 39% within reach splits by what a model would need. The dates, pace and reliability follow the controls above. Estimates.

36%

of the working time. The material can be handed to a model and the result handed back.

2%

of the working time. The model has to be connected to the system the work lives in.

, not counted
1%

is conversation short enough by length. This site leaves conversation with people, so it is not in the total.

How far this has come

With GPT-4, measured in March 2023, 0% of this job's working time was within reach at . With Claude 3.7 Sonnet, measured in February 2025, 0%. With Claude Mythos Preview (early), measured in April 2026, 11%. Today's estimate: 39%.

0%10%20%30%40%50%2023202420252026GPT-4, March 2023: 0% within reachGPT-4 Turbo (Nov 2023), November 2023: 0% within reachGPT-4o, May 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.5 Sonnet (June 2024), June 2024: 0% within reacho1-preview, September 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024), October 2024: 0% within reacho1, December 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.7 Sonnet, February 2025: 0% within reacho3, April 2025: 0% within reachGPT-5, August 2025: 1% within reachGemini 3 Pro, November 2025: 2% within reachClaude Opus 4.5, November 2025: 2% within reachGPT-5.2, December 2025: 2% within reachClaude Opus 4.6, February 2026: 3% within reachClaude Mythos Preview (early), April 2026: 11% within reachToday (estimate), November 2026: 39% within reach
Each step is a new best model measured by METR, four in five; the dashed end is today's estimate. Point at a dot for the model.

A backcast: today's task data with the best model METR had measured by each date. It shows how fast the models have moved, not what anyone forecast at the time.

Measured use over time

Of the Claude.ai conversations Anthropic sampled and tied to a work task, no reportable share went to this job's tasks in May 2026; 0 of its 28 tasks showed up. Within each of Anthropic's methods, never across a change: 0.22% to 0.16% (released February and March 2025); 0.2% to 0.098% (August 2025 to February 2026).

0%0.25%0.5%20252026released February 2025: 0.22%released March 2025: 0.16%the week of Aug 4, 2025: 0.2%the week of Nov 13, 2025: 0.091%the week of Feb 5, 2026: 0.098%April 2026: noneMay 2026: none
Each dot is one release's sample. A line joins releases made by the same method; a change of method starts a new line. Point at a dot for its window.
Each release
ConversationsShareRankTasks seen
Released February 20250.22%84 of 7087 of 28
Released March 20250.16%107 of 7039 of 28
The week of Aug 4, 20250.2%95 of 6556 of 28
The week of Nov 13, 20250.091%168 of 6726 of 28
The week of Feb 5, 20260.098%165 of 6776 of 28
April 2026nonen/a0 of 28
May 2026nonen/a0 of 28

Measured, not estimated: Anthropic's samples of Claude.ai conversations, each tied by a model to an O*NET task, from the Anthropic Economic Index. It says where Claude's use goes, not how much of this job's working time it covers, so it is not on the same scale as the reach above. The releases differ in their sample, their classifier and the smallest share they report (the June 2026 file rounds each task to a hundredth of a percent, so a smaller task reads as none), which is why a change of method starts a new line. At least 96% of each older release's task-tied use matched this site's tasks, and all of the newest. Claude.ai only, so use through other tools and other companies' models is not in it. Every job ranked.

Robots and the physical work

Anthropic rates 59% of this job's working time as physical work. For 33% of the working time, a robot has been shown doing most of the task somewhere: 33% in a purpose-built cell. 0.33 of 3, the 371st highest of the 923 jobs.

  • Not physical 41%
  • No robot shown 26%
  • In a purpose-built cell 33%

Anthropic's rating, not this site's estimate: Claude Opus 5, searching the web, rated each physical O*NET task by the kind of setting in which a robot it could cite (deployed, sold or demonstrated) does most of the task, weighted by its own estimate of each task's share of the time (What work can robots do?, September 30, 2026, data CC BY 4.0; every job ranked). A robot shown somewhere is not a robot in your building: cost, setup and safety decide that. The share within reach on this page still counts no body work. The robot behind each rated task is under the task below.

What changes for the people in this job

From the task-by-task review, by the end of 2028 on the long-run pace at four in five. It says which parts of the work stay with people and which change, not whether anyone keeps a job: that depends on decisions no data set can see.

What stays with people

51% of the working time: the conversation, in-person and hands-on parts of the tasks.

  • Install control and automation systems, the hands-on work, 13%
  • Repair electronics equipment, the hands-on work, 10%
  • Assemble and test circuitry, the hands-on work, 7%
  • Assemble electrical prototypes, the hands-on work, 4%
  • Take part in training, the in-person work, 3%
  • Resolve malfunctions with manufacturers, the hands-on work, 3%

What becomes checking the machine

35% of the working time: desk work a model could do by then, in tasks where a mistake costs something or a licensed person signs. A person checks it. Another 12% is desk work that is small if wrong, which can be handed over with lighter checks.

  • Review plans against codes, severe if wrong, 8%
  • Design electrical schematics, severe if wrong, 5%
  • Produce electronics drawings, costly if wrong, 4%
  • Calculate specifications and estimates, costly if wrong, 3%
  • Run quality control programs, costly if wrong, 3%
  • Integrate software and hardware, costly if wrong, 2%

What to learn

  • Briefing a model and checking its drafts. About 45% of the time is documents and data, the part models reach first: writing a clear brief, giving the right material, and checking what comes back.
  • The hands-on craft. About 43% of the time is hands-on work, which no model here does; robots are rated separately on this page.
  • Reviewing work you did not do yourself. The tasks under What becomes checking the machine, where a mistake costs something, stay a person's to check: spotting what a draft gets wrong is a skill of its own.
  • Judgment where errors are severe. Some tasks are severe if wrong. Knowing when not to trust an output matters more there than speed.

Your own version of this job: read it against your job description. The headline is free; the full personal report, every task with its timeline and what to learn, is $19 (a sample).

The tasks

Sorted by . 28 tasks from .

Task
Install or maintain electrical control systems, industrial automation systems, or electrical equipment, including control circuits, variable speed drives, or programmable logic controllers.Control circuits, drives and controllers installed and maintained.Done more than yearly by most who do it.Robots: no robot shown. Anthropic's rating.13%5 h1.7 h to 2.1 work daysHands-on 100%Stays with people
Modify, maintain, or repair electronics equipment or systems to ensure proper functioning.Equipment modified and repaired by hand.Done daily by most who do it. Robots: no robot shown. Anthropic's rating.10%2.5 h50 min to 5 hHands-on 100%Stays with people
Conduct statistical studies to analyze or compare production costs for sustainable or nonsustainable designs.Statistical studies on paper.Done more than monthly by most who do it.9%1.7 work days5 h to 4.2 work daysDocuments 100%41%Half by Dec 2026
Review electrical engineering plans to ensure adherence to design specifications and compliance with applicable electrical codes and standards.Plans read against the specifications and codes.Done more than weekly by most who do it. 8%2.5 h50 min to 6.7 hDocuments 100%96%Half by now
Assemble, test, or maintain circuitry or electronic components, according to engineering instructions, technical manuals, or knowledge of electronics, using hand or power tools.Circuitry built and tested with hand and power tools.Done daily by most who do it. Robots: in a purpose-built cell, Fuji NXT-R SMT placement machine (sold). Anthropic's rating.7%2.5 h50 min to 6.7 hHands-on 100%Stays with people
Design or modify engineering schematics for electrical transmission and distribution systems or for electrical installation in residential, commercial, or industrial buildings, using computer-aided design (CAD) software.Schematics designed in CAD.Done more than yearly by most who do it.5%5 h1.7 h to 1.9 work daysDocuments 100%77%Half by now
Produce electronics drawings or other graphics representing industrial control, instrumentation, sensors, or analog or digital telecommunications networks, using computer-aided design (CAD) software.Drawings made in CAD.Done more than yearly by most who do it.4%3.3 h1.3 h to 1.3 work daysDocuments 100%91%Half by now
Specify, coordinate, or conduct quality control or quality assurance programs or procedures.Procedures written and checks made at the bench.Done daily by most who do it.Robots: in a purpose-built cell, Koh Young Zenith / Zenith Alpha 3D AOI (sold). Anthropic's rating.4%3.3 h50 min to 1.3 work daysDocuments 60%, hands-on 40%48%Desk part half by now
Assemble electrical systems or prototypes, using hand tools or measuring instruments.Systems built with hand tools and instruments.Done more than yearly by most who do it. Robots: in a purpose-built cell, Japan Unix soldering robots (UNIX-GF / HFR / VFR / DF series) (sold). Anthropic's rating.4%3.3 h50 min to 6.7 hHands-on 100%Stays with people
Supervise the installation or operation of electronic equipment or systems.Overseeing installation on site, with the plans.Done more than yearly by most who do it. 4%3.3 h50 min to 1.7 work daysIn person 70%, documents 30%21%Desk part half by now
Participate in training or continuing education activities to stay abreast of engineering or industry advances.Attendance and learning only the technician can do.Done more than yearly by most who do it. 3%3.3 h50 min to 6.7 hIn person 100%Stays with people
Integrate software or hardware components, using computer, microprocessor, or control architecture.Components integrated on the bench and in code.Done more than yearly by most who do it.Robots: no robot shown. Anthropic's rating.3%3.3 h1.3 h to 1.3 work daysDocuments 60%, hands-on 40%55%Desk part half by now

Within reach, per task: the share of the task's time whose instances are short enough for a model to finish at the chosen date, pace and reliability. Half by: the date half of that time comes within reach. Made of: how the task's time splits among five kinds of doing. Only the documents and systems parts can count as within reach, so a task that is 30% documents can be at most 30% within reach.

Jobs that share skills with this one

From O*NET's related occupations. Within reach now and by the end of 2028, long-run pace, four in five.

Questions about this job

How much of the work of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians is within reach of AI now?
An estimated 39% of the working time is within reach of AI models now and 48% by the end of 2028, on METR's long-run pace at four in five. Within reach means a model could finish work that long at that reliability. It is not a forecast of jobs lost or of savings.
Which tasks of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians come within reach first?
Weighted by the time each takes, the tasks with the most within reach now (projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index) are: Review plans against codes (96% of the task's time now); Produce electronics drawings (91% of the task's time now, 100% by the end of 2028); and Conduct cost studies (41% of the task's time now, 100% by the end of 2028).
Which tasks of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians stay with people?
Tasks that are people work or body work are not counted as within reach at any date. The largest: Install control and automation systems; Repair electronics equipment; and Assemble and test circuitry. Together such tasks are about 42% of the working time, and the people and body parts of the other tasks stay with people too.
What should Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians learn as AI takes on more of the work?
By the job's own task-by-task review, the first things to learn are briefing a model and checking its drafts; the hands-on craft; and reviewing work you did not do yourself. By the end of 2028 on the long-run pace at four in five, about 51% of the working time stays with people, 35% becomes checking a model's work and 12% could be handed over with lighter checks. It says which parts of the work change, never whether anyone keeps a job.
Do people already use AI for the work of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians?
In the Claude.ai conversations Anthropic sampled for May 2026, no reportable share went to this job's tasks. Anthropic's labor market measure puts the share of the job's tasks seen in real Claude use at work at 2%. These are measures of use, not of how much of the work AI could finish, and they cover Claude only.
Can robots do the physical work of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians?
Anthropic's robot exposure rating (September 2026) finds 59% of the working time is physical work, and that a robot has been shown doing most of the task, somewhere, for 33% of the working time. Its index is 0.33 of 3. One example: Fuji NXT-R SMT placement machine for "assemble and test circuitry". A robot shown somewhere is not one in every workplace; this site's own estimates still count no physical work as within reach.
How is this estimated?
From the 28 tasks O*NET lists for the occupation, each with an estimated length checked against GDPval and a share of the working time, reviewed one task at a time on September 30, 2026 for what each is made of (documents, business systems, conversation, in person, hands-on), and METR's measurements of how long a task the best AI models can finish, carried forward to the date from the latest, Claude Mythos Preview (early) in April 2026. Data checked November 10, 2026.

How the estimates are made

This job in your state or metro area
Embed these figures on your site

A small card with the share of working time within reach now and at the end of 2027, 2028 and 2030, the date and a link back. Free under CC BY 4.0; the card carries the credit.

See the card

Your own version of this job

The page above is the occupation. Your job is your title and what you actually do: give both, and they are read against these tasks in your browser, nothing sent anywhere. The headline is free: how much of your working time is within reach now and by the end of 2028, and how many of the tasks your description names.

The full personal report is $19, to print or save as a PDF: every task with when it comes within reach, which ones your description names, the parts of your description the task list does not cover, what stays with you, what becomes checking the machine and what to learn.