Skip to content
STRATUSWORKFORCE SCAN

Cytotechnologists

In short: today's best AI models could do about 28% of this job's working time (projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index) if the work were set up for them, and about the same by the end of 2028 if progress keeps its long-run pace. The people and hands-on work, about 72% of the time, stays with people.

Compare with another job

Stain, mount, and study cells to detect evidence of cancer, hormonal abnormalities, and other pathological conditions following established standards and practices.

$62,930 a year (for the broader BLS group this job sits in).

A typical 40-hour week

Not yet reviewed task by task
  • AI could take on11 h
  • A person checks AI's work0 h
  • Desk work AI can't do yet0 h
  • Stays with people29 h

Cytotechnologists, now: of a 40-hour week, AI could take on 11 hours, 0 hours become checking its work, 0 hours are desk work it can't do yet, and 29 hours stay with people.

The largest pieces: Provide patient clinical data or microscopic findings to assist pathologists in the preparation of pathology reports (about 3 h); Examine cell samples to detect abnormalities in the color, shape, or size of cellular components and patterns (about 3 h); Assign tasks or coordinate task assignments to ensure adequate performance of laboratory activities (about 2 h).

Estimates for a typical week of this job, if progress keeps its long-run pace, counting work the best models finish four times in five. Every task is below.

now
28%

of the working time. Now is projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index.

Kinds of work
  • 28%
  • 0%
  • 72%
n/a

Anthropic's data does not cover this job.

Half the desk work within reach
Already

On the chosen pace and reliability. Estimate.

Share of the working time within reach, now to 2030

0%25%50%75%100%2027202820292030NowDesk work: 28% of the time
Chosen to Ceiling: the share
DateNow
NowEnd of 2030
Change assumptionsLong-run pace, four in five

What each choice means: , , , , . Every pace starts from .

At this date and pace, models finish tasks up to 2.4 work days long four times in five.

How far this has come

With GPT-4, measured in March 2023, 0% of this job's working time was within reach at . With Claude 3.7 Sonnet, measured in February 2025, 8%. With Claude Mythos Preview (early), measured in April 2026, 26%. Today's estimate: 28%.

0%10%20%30%40%2023202420252026GPT-4, March 2023: 0% within reachGPT-4 Turbo (Nov 2023), November 2023: 0% within reachGPT-4o, May 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.5 Sonnet (June 2024), June 2024: 0% within reacho1-preview, September 2024: 1% within reachClaude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024), October 2024: 1% within reacho1, December 2024: 4% within reachClaude 3.7 Sonnet, February 2025: 8% within reacho3, April 2025: 18% within reachGPT-5, August 2025: 20% within reachGemini 3 Pro, November 2025: 23% within reachClaude Opus 4.5, November 2025: 23% within reachGPT-5.2, December 2025: 24% within reachClaude Opus 4.6, February 2026: 24% within reachClaude Mythos Preview (early), April 2026: 26% within reachToday (estimate), November 2026: 28% within reach
Each step is a new best model measured by METR, four in five; the dashed end is today's estimate. Point at a dot for the model.

A backcast: today's task data with the best model METR had measured by each date. It shows how fast the models have moved, not what anyone forecast at the time.

Measured use over time

Of the Claude.ai conversations Anthropic sampled and tied to a work task, no reportable share went to this job's tasks in May 2026; 0 of its 13 tasks showed up. Within each of Anthropic's methods, never across a change: 0.031% to 0.012% (released February and March 2025); 0.059% to 0.013% (August 2025 to February 2026).

0%0.05%0.1%20252026released February 2025: 0.031%released March 2025: 0.012%the week of Aug 4, 2025: 0.059%the week of Nov 13, 2025: 0.011%the week of Feb 5, 2026: 0.013%April 2026: noneMay 2026: none
Each dot is one release's sample. A line joins releases made by the same method; a change of method starts a new line. Point at a dot for its window.
Each release
ConversationsShareRankTasks seen
Released February 20250.031%359 of 7085 of 13
Released March 20250.012%488 of 7034 of 13
The week of Aug 4, 20250.059%219 of 6553 of 13
The week of Nov 13, 20250.011%465 of 6722 of 13
The week of Feb 5, 20260.013%454 of 6773 of 13
April 2026nonen/a0 of 13
May 2026nonen/a0 of 13

Measured, not estimated: Anthropic's samples of Claude.ai conversations, each tied by a model to an O*NET task, from the Anthropic Economic Index. It says where Claude's use goes, not how much of this job's working time it covers, so it is not on the same scale as the reach above. The releases differ in their sample, their classifier and the smallest share they report (the June 2026 file rounds each task to a hundredth of a percent, so a smaller task reads as none), which is why a change of method starts a new line. At least 96% of each older release's task-tied use matched this site's tasks, and all of the newest. Claude.ai only, so use through other tools and other companies' models is not in it. Every job ranked.

Robots and the physical work

Anthropic rates 53% of this job's working time as physical work. For 32% of the working time, a robot has been shown doing most of the task somewhere: 26% in a purpose-built cell, 6% in a structured facility. 0.39 of 3, the 348th highest of the 923 jobs.

  • Not physical 47%
  • No robot shown 21%
  • In a purpose-built cell 26%
  • In a structured facility 6%

Anthropic's rating, not this site's estimate: Claude Opus 5, searching the web, rated each physical O*NET task by the kind of setting in which a robot it could cite (deployed, sold or demonstrated) does most of the task, weighted by its own estimate of each task's share of the time (What work can robots do?, September 30, 2026, data CC BY 4.0; every job ranked). A robot shown somewhere is not a robot in your building: cost, setup and safety decide that. The share within reach on this page still counts no body work. The robot behind each rated task is under the task below.

The tasks

Sorted by . 13 tasks from .

TaskKind
Prepare and analyze samples, such as Papanicolaou (PAP) smear body fluids and fine needle aspirations (FNAs), to detect abnormal conditions.Done hourly or more by most who do it. Robots: no robot shown. Anthropic's rating.28%50 min25 min to 1.7 hStays with people
Maintain effective laboratory operations by adhering to standards of specimen collection, preparation, or laboratory safety.Done hourly or more by most who do it. Robots: in a purpose-built cell, Hologic ThinPrep Genesis processor (sold). Anthropic's rating.14%25 min13 min to 1.3 hStays with people
Examine specimens, using microscopes, to evaluate specimen quality.Done hourly or more by most who do it. Robots: in a structured facility, Hologic Genius Digital Diagnostics System (Genius Digital Imager) (sold). Anthropic's rating.8%13 min4 min to 25 minStays with people
Provide patient clinical data or microscopic findings to assist pathologists in the preparation of pathology reports.Done several times a day by most who do it. 8%17 min8 min to 38 min100%Half by now
Assist pathologists or other physicians to collect cell samples by fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy or other method.Done daily by most who do it. Robots: in a purpose-built cell, ASP Health ROSE Prep / ROSE View (automated ROSE workflow) (deployed). Anthropic's rating.8%38 min17 min to 1.3 hStays with people
Examine cell samples to detect abnormalities in the color, shape, or size of cellular components and patterns.Done hourly or more by most who do it. AI observed on this task.7%8 min4 min to 21 min100%Half by now
Assign tasks or coordinate task assignments to ensure adequate performance of laboratory activities.Done daily by most who do it. 6%25 min13 min to 1.3 h100%Half by now
Prepare cell samples by applying special staining techniques, such as chromosomal staining, to differentiate cells or cell components.Done daily by most who do it. Robots: in a purpose-built cell, BD Totalys SlidePrep / BD Totalys MultiProcessor (Becton Dickinson) (sold). Anthropic's rating.5%38 min17 min to 1.3 hStays with people
Adjust, maintain, or repair laboratory equipment, such as microscopes.Done daily by most who do it. Robots: no robot shown. Anthropic's rating.5%38 min13 min to 2.5 hStays with people
Submit slides with abnormal cell structures to pathologists for further examination.Done several times a day by most who do it. Robots: in a purpose-built cell, Automated Glass Slide Archive System (Kilde Automation archiving robot) (deployed). Anthropic's rating.4%8 min4 min to 17 minStays with people
Document specimens by verifying patients' and specimens' information.Done hourly or more by most who do it. Robots: in a purpose-built cell, ThinPrep 5000 Processor with AutoLoader (Hologic) (sold). Anthropic's rating.3%4 min2 min to 10 min100%Half by now
Examine specimens to detect abnormal hormone conditions.Done yearly or less by most who do it. AI observed on this task.2%13 min4 min to 25 min100%Half by now

Within reach, per task: the share of the task's time whose instances are short enough for a model to finish at the chosen date, pace and reliability. Half by: the date half of that time comes within reach.

Jobs that share skills with this one

From O*NET's related occupations. Within reach now and by the end of 2028, long-run pace, four in five.

Where this job works

The industry groups that employ the most of it (BLS, May 2025). Counts are for the broader BLS group this job sits in.

Where the most of these jobs are

The metro areas with the most people in it (BLS, May 2025). Counts are for the broader BLS group this job sits in.

Questions about this job

How much of the work of Cytotechnologists is within reach of AI now?
An estimated 28% of the working time is within reach of AI models now and 28% by the end of 2028, on METR's long-run pace at four in five. Within reach means a model could finish work that long at that reliability. It is not a forecast of jobs lost or of savings.
Which tasks of Cytotechnologists come within reach first?
Weighted by the time each takes, the tasks with the most within reach now (projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index) are: Provide patient clinical data or microscopic findings to assist pathologists in the preparation of pathology reports (100% of the task's time now); Examine cell samples to detect abnormalities in the color, shape, or size of cellular components and patterns (100% of the task's time now); and Assign tasks or coordinate task assignments to ensure adequate performance of laboratory activities (100% of the task's time now).
Which tasks of Cytotechnologists stay with people?
Tasks that are people work or body work are not counted as within reach at any date. The largest: Prepare and analyze samples, such as Papanicolaou (PAP) smear body fluids and fine needle aspirations (FNAs), to detect abnormal conditions; Maintain effective laboratory operations by adhering to standards of specimen collection, preparation, or laboratory safety; and Examine specimens, using microscopes, to evaluate specimen quality. Together such tasks are about 72% of the working time.
Do people already use AI for the work of Cytotechnologists?
In the Claude.ai conversations Anthropic sampled for May 2026, no reportable share went to this job's tasks. These are measures of use, not of how much of the work AI could finish, and they cover Claude only.
Can robots do the physical work of Cytotechnologists?
Anthropic's robot exposure rating (September 2026) finds 53% of the working time is physical work, and that a robot has been shown doing most of the task, somewhere, for 32% of the working time, 6% in a structured facility. Its index is 0.39 of 3. One example: Hologic Genius Digital Diagnostics System (Genius Digital Imager) for "examine specimens, using microscopes, to evaluate specimen quality". A robot shown somewhere is not one in every workplace; this site's own estimates still count no physical work as within reach.
How is this estimated?
From the 13 tasks O*NET lists for the occupation, each with an estimated length checked against GDPval and a share of the working time, each classed as desk, people or body work, and METR's measurements of how long a task the best AI models can finish, carried forward to the date from the latest, Claude Mythos Preview (early) in April 2026. Data checked November 10, 2026.

How the estimates are made

This job in your state or metro area
Embed these figures on your site

A small card with the share of working time within reach now and at the end of 2027, 2028 and 2030, the date and a link back. Free under CC BY 4.0; the card carries the credit.

See the card

Your own version of this job

The page above is the occupation. Your job is your title and what you actually do: give both, and they are read against these tasks in your browser, nothing sent anywhere. The headline is free: how much of your working time is within reach now and by the end of 2028, and how many of the tasks your description names.

This occupation has not been reviewed task by task yet, so the full personal report is not offered for it; 402 of 923 occupations are reviewed so far, largest first.