Skip to content
STRATUSWORKFORCE SCAN

Bioengineers and Biomedical Engineers

In short: today's best AI models could do about 15% of this job's working time (projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index) if the work were set up for them, and about 55% by the end of 2028 if progress keeps its long-run pace. The people and hands-on work, about 34% of the time, stays with people.

Compare with another job

Apply knowledge of engineering, biology, chemistry, computer science, and biomechanical principles to the design, development, and evaluation of biological, agricultural, and health systems and products, such as artificial organs, prostheses, instrumentation, medical information systems, and health management and care delivery systems.

23,480 people do this job in the US. $109,370 a year.

A typical 40-hour week

Not yet reviewed task by task
  • AI could take on6 h
  • A person checks AI's work0 h
  • Desk work AI can't do yet20 h
  • Stays with people14 h

Bioengineers and Biomedical Engineers, now: of a 40-hour week, AI could take on 6 hours, 0 hours become checking its work, 20 hours are desk work it can't do yet, and 14 hours stay with people.

The largest pieces: Manage teams of engineers by creating schedules, tracking inventory, creating or using budgets, or overseeing contract obligations or deadlines (about 2 h); Prepare technical reports, data summary documents, or research articles for scientific publication, regulatory submissions, or patent applications (about 1 h); Write documents describing protocols, policies, standards for use, maintenance, and repair of medical equipment (under an hour).

Estimates for a typical week of this job, if progress keeps its long-run pace, counting work the best models finish four times in five. Every task is below.

now
15%

of the working time. Now is projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index.

Kinds of work
  • 66%
  • 14%
  • 20%
13%

of the work: Anthropic's measure of what people already bring to Claude at work (2025). It counts help with part of a task, so it can be higher than the share within reach.

Half the desk work within reach
October 2027

On the chosen pace and reliability. Estimate.

Share of the working time within reach, now to 2030

0%25%50%75%100%2027202820292030NowDesk work: 66% of the time
Chosen to Ceiling: the share
DateNow
NowEnd of 2030
Change assumptionsLong-run pace, four in five

What each choice means: , , , , . Every pace starts from .

At this date and pace, models finish tasks up to 2.4 work days long four times in five.

How far this has come

With GPT-4, measured in March 2023, 0% of this job's working time was within reach at . With Claude 3.7 Sonnet, measured in February 2025, 0%. With Claude Mythos Preview (early), measured in April 2026, 1%. Today's estimate: 15%.

0%5%10%15%20%2023202420252026GPT-4, March 2023: 0% within reachGPT-4 Turbo (Nov 2023), November 2023: 0% within reachGPT-4o, May 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.5 Sonnet (June 2024), June 2024: 0% within reacho1-preview, September 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024), October 2024: 0% within reacho1, December 2024: 0% within reachClaude 3.7 Sonnet, February 2025: 0% within reacho3, April 2025: 0% within reachGPT-5, August 2025: 0% within reachGemini 3 Pro, November 2025: 0% within reachClaude Opus 4.5, November 2025: 0% within reachGPT-5.2, December 2025: 0% within reachClaude Opus 4.6, February 2026: 0% within reachClaude Mythos Preview (early), April 2026: 1% within reachToday (estimate), November 2026: 15% within reach
Each step is a new best model measured by METR, four in five; the dashed end is today's estimate. Point at a dot for the model.

A backcast: today's task data with the best model METR had measured by each date. It shows how fast the models have moved, not what anyone forecast at the time.

Measured use over time

Of the Claude.ai conversations Anthropic sampled and tied to a work task, 0.011% went to this job's tasks in May 2026, the 357th largest of the 447 jobs that showed up at all; 1 of its 30 tasks showed up. Within each of Anthropic's methods, never across a change: 0.075% to 0.086% (released February and March 2025); 0.095% to 0.084% (August 2025 to February 2026); 0.011% to 0.011% (April to May 2026).

0%0.1%0.2%20252026released February 2025: 0.075%released March 2025: 0.086%the week of Aug 4, 2025: 0.095%the week of Nov 13, 2025: 0.086%the week of Feb 5, 2026: 0.084%April 2026: 0.011%May 2026: 0.011%
Each dot is one release's sample. A line joins releases made by the same method; a change of method starts a new line. Point at a dot for its window.
Each release
ConversationsShareRankTasks seen
Released February 20250.075%216 of 70810 of 30
Released March 20250.086%178 of 70310 of 30
The week of Aug 4, 20250.095%162 of 6557 of 30
The week of Nov 13, 20250.086%170 of 6727 of 30
The week of Feb 5, 20260.084%184 of 6776 of 30
April 20260.011%341 of 4341 of 30
May 20260.011%357 of 4471 of 30

Measured, not estimated: Anthropic's samples of Claude.ai conversations, each tied by a model to an O*NET task, from the Anthropic Economic Index. It says where Claude's use goes, not how much of this job's working time it covers, so it is not on the same scale as the reach above. The releases differ in their sample, their classifier and the smallest share they report (the June 2026 file rounds each task to a hundredth of a percent, so a smaller task reads as none), which is why a change of method starts a new line. At least 96% of each older release's task-tied use matched this site's tasks, and all of the newest. Claude.ai only, so use through other tools and other companies' models is not in it. Every job ranked.

Robots and the physical work

Anthropic rates 10% of this job's working time as physical work. For 10% of the working time, a robot has been shown doing most of the task somewhere: 10% in a purpose-built cell. 0.10 of 3, the 523rd highest of the 923 jobs.

  • Not physical 90%
  • In a purpose-built cell 10%

Anthropic's rating, not this site's estimate: Claude Opus 5, searching the web, rated each physical O*NET task by the kind of setting in which a robot it could cite (deployed, sold or demonstrated) does most of the task, weighted by its own estimate of each task's share of the time (What work can robots do?, September 30, 2026, data CC BY 4.0; every job ranked). A robot shown somewhere is not a robot in your building: cost, setup and safety decide that. The share within reach on this page still counts no body work. The robot behind each rated task is under the task below.

The tasks

Sorted by . 30 tasks from .

TaskKind
Prepare technical reports, data summary documents, or research articles for scientific publication, regulatory submissions, or patent applications.Done more than monthly by most who do it. AI observed on this task.7%1.7 work days6.7 h to 4.2 work days49%Half by now
Develop statistical models or simulations, using statistical or modeling software.Done more than monthly by most who do it. 7%2.1 work days3.3 h to 1.7 work weeks15%Half by Oct 2027
Conduct research, along with life scientists, chemists, and medical scientists, on the engineering aspects of the biological systems of humans and animals.Done more than yearly by most who do it. AI observed on this task.Robots: in a purpose-built cell, Maholo LabDroid + Bayesian optimization AI (RIKEN / Robotic Biology Institute) (RIKEN, Robotic Biology Institute) (demonstrated). Anthropic's rating.7%4.2 work days2.1 work days to 3.5 work weeksStays with people
Adapt or design computer hardware or software for medical science uses.Done more than weekly by most who do it. 7%4.2 work days6.7 h to 4.2 work weeks5%Half by Jun 2028
Develop models or computer simulations of human biobehavioral systems to obtain data for measuring or controlling life processes.Done more than weekly by most who do it. 7%4.2 work days6.7 h to 4.2 work weeks5%Half by Jun 2028
Design or conduct follow-up experimentation, based on generated data, to meet established process objectives.Done more than monthly by most who do it. Robots: in a purpose-built cell, Mobile robotic chemist (Burger et al., Nature 583, 237) (University of Liverpool) (demonstrated). Anthropic's rating.7%4.2 work days6.7 h to 2.5 work weeksStays with people
Design or direct bench or pilot production experiments to determine the scale of production methods that optimize product yield and minimize production costs.Done yearly or less by most who do it.7%1.7 work weeks2.1 work days to 1.2 work monthsStays with people
Design or develop medical diagnostic or clinical instrumentation, equipment, or procedures, using the principles of engineering and biobehavioral sciences.Done daily by most who do it. 7%2 work weeks2.5 work days to 1.6 work months1%Half by Sep 2028
Manage teams of engineers by creating schedules, tracking inventory, creating or using budgets, or overseeing contract obligations or deadlines.Done more than weekly by most who do it. 7%6.7 h1.7 h to 2.5 work days55%Half by now
Develop bioremediation processes to reduce pollution, protect the environment, or treat waste products.Done yearly or less by most who do it.5%3.3 work weeks4.2 work days to 2.4 work months0%Half by Jan 2029
Develop methodologies for transferring procedures or biological processes from laboratories to commercial-scale manufacturing production.Done yearly or less by most who do it. 4%1.7 work weeks2.1 work days to 1.5 work months1%Half by Aug 2028
Write documents describing protocols, policies, standards for use, maintenance, and repair of medical equipment.Done more than yearly by most who do it. 4%1 work day3.3 h to 3.1 work days61%Half by now

Within reach, per task: the share of the task's time whose instances are short enough for a model to finish at the chosen date, pace and reliability. Half by: the date half of that time comes within reach.

Jobs that share skills with this one

From O*NET's related occupations. Within reach now and by the end of 2028, long-run pace, four in five.

Questions about this job

How much of the work of Bioengineers and Biomedical Engineers is within reach of AI now?
An estimated 15% of the working time is within reach of AI models now and 55% by the end of 2028, on METR's long-run pace at four in five (37% to 64% across the three paces the site shows). Within reach means a model could finish work that long at that reliability. It is not a forecast of jobs lost or of savings.
Which tasks of Bioengineers and Biomedical Engineers come within reach first?
Weighted by the time each takes, the tasks with the most within reach now (projected from METR's April 2026 measurement and Epoch's November 2026 index) are: Manage teams of engineers by creating schedules, tracking inventory, creating or using budgets, or overseeing contract obligations or deadlines (55% of the task's time now, 100% by the end of 2028); Prepare technical reports, data summary documents, or research articles for scientific publication, regulatory submissions, or patent applications (49% of the task's time now, 100% by the end of 2028); and Write documents describing protocols, policies, standards for use, maintenance, and repair of medical equipment (61% of the task's time now, 100% by the end of 2028).
Which tasks of Bioengineers and Biomedical Engineers stay with people?
Tasks that are people work or body work are not counted as within reach at any date. The largest: Conduct research, along with life scientists, chemists, and medical scientists, on the engineering aspects of the biological systems of humans and animals; Design or conduct follow-up experimentation, based on generated data, to meet established process objectives; and Design or direct bench or pilot production experiments to determine the scale of production methods that optimize product yield and minimize production costs. Together such tasks are about 34% of the working time.
Do people already use AI for the work of Bioengineers and Biomedical Engineers?
In the Claude.ai conversations Anthropic sampled for May 2026 and tied to a work task, 0.011% went to this job's tasks, the 357th largest share of the 447 jobs that showed up; 1 of its 30 tasks appeared. Anthropic's labor market measure puts the share of the job's tasks seen in real Claude use at work at 13%. These are measures of use, not of how much of the work AI could finish, and they cover Claude only.
Can robots do the physical work of Bioengineers and Biomedical Engineers?
Anthropic's robot exposure rating (September 2026) finds 10% of the working time is physical work, and that a robot has been shown doing most of the task, somewhere, for 10% of the working time. Its index is 0.10 of 3. One example: Maholo LabDroid + Bayesian optimization AI (RIKEN / Robotic Biology Institute) for "conduct research, along with life scientists, chemists, and medical scientists, on the engineering aspects of the biological systems of humans and animals". A robot shown somewhere is not one in every workplace; this site's own estimates still count no physical work as within reach.
How is this estimated?
From the 30 tasks O*NET lists for the occupation, each with an estimated length checked against GDPval and a share of the working time, each classed as desk, people or body work, and METR's measurements of how long a task the best AI models can finish, carried forward to the date from the latest, Claude Mythos Preview (early) in April 2026. Data checked November 10, 2026.

How the estimates are made

This job in your state or metro area
Embed these figures on your site

A small card with the share of working time within reach now and at the end of 2027, 2028 and 2030, the date and a link back. Free under CC BY 4.0; the card carries the credit.

See the card

Your own version of this job

The page above is the occupation. Your job is your title and what you actually do: give both, and they are read against these tasks in your browser, nothing sent anywhere. The headline is free: how much of your working time is within reach now and by the end of 2028, and how many of the tasks your description names.

This occupation has not been reviewed task by task yet, so the full personal report is not offered for it; 402 of 923 occupations are reviewed so far, largest first.