Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (PKOH)

Fastener supply, auto components and forging equipment. Read October 19, 2026 from the annual report for the period ending December 31, 2025, filed March 5, 2026. Ranked 45 of the 198 Industrials companies read so far, by the share within reach now.

Park-Ohio’s approximately 6,300 employees, 38% in the United States, supply fasteners, make vehicle assembly components and build induction and forging equipment, split by the segments’ revenue by description.

The figures on this page come from the company's own annual report and from BLS staffing patterns for its industries, never from a roster. They are estimates with a stated method. Nothing here says what the company will do: within reach is not a forecast of jobs lost or of savings.

What follows from the reading

Share of working time within reach of AI, on the long-run pace at four in five: 20% now, 30% at the end of 2027, 34% at the end of 2028, 35% at the end of 2030. By the patterns, the work is about 35% desk work, 16% people work and 49% body work. These are the site's industry estimates weighted by the shares below: estimates with a stated method and range, not a forecast of what the company will do. By the same patterns, at the end of 2028 about 64% of the working time stays with people (conversation, in-person and hands-on work), 28% becomes checking a model's work and 7% could be handed over with lighter checks, from the industries' own figures, not the company's roles.

Headcount

6,300 employees as of December 31, 2025 (stated). Approximately 2,400 of 6,300 employees are in the United States and 3,900 in other countries, by the filing.

The filing: “As of December 31, 2025, we employed approximately 6,300 employees in our operations around the world. Approximately 2,400 of these employees are in the United States, while the remaining 3,900 are employed in other countries.”

The workforce as industry patterns

What the filing says about the workforce: Approximately 6,300 employees, 2,400 in the United States; about 20% covered by collective bargaining agreements, three agreements covering about 1,200 full-time employees.

Companies read with the same leading pattern

Other companies whose largest staffing pattern is also Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing, largest first, each read from its own annual report. Within reach now and at the end of 2028, long-run pace, four in five.

• Lear Corporation (LEA, 164,300 employees)16% now, 28% by 2028
• Aptiv PLC (APTV, 140,000 employees)16% now, 28% by 2028
• Adient plc (ADNT, 65,000 employees)16% now, 28% by 2028
• Autoliv, Inc. (ALV, 64,300 employees)16% now, 28% by 2028
• BorgWarner Inc. (BWA, 37,500 employees)16% now, 28% by 2028
• Dana Incorporated (DAN, 26,900 employees)17% now, 30% by 2028
• Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. (CPS, 22,000 employees)16% now, 28% by 2028
• Dauch Corp. (DCH, 18,000 employees)17% now, 29% by 2028

What the filing says about AI

5 sentences in the filing name AI. The filing names AI five times, as risks: possibly incorporating AI into products and processes, and the liabilities of its use.

• “We may be incorporating artificial intelligence ("AI") technologies into our products, services and processes.”
• “The introduction of AI and machine-learning technologies, particularly generative AI, into internal processes, third-party services and/or new and existing offerings, may result in new or expanded risks and liabilities due to enhanced governmental or regulatory scrutiny, litigation, compliance issues, ethical concerns, confidentiality or security risks, as well as other factors that could adver...”
• “In addition, our personnel could, unbeknownst to us, improperly utilize AI and machine-learning technology while carrying out their responsibilities.”
• “The use of AI in third-party services and the development of our products and services could also cause loss of intellectual property, as well as subject us to risks related to intellectual property infringement or misappropriation, data privacy and cybersecurity.”
• “The use of AI can lead to unintended consequences, including generating content that appears correct but is factually inaccurate, misleading or otherwise flawed, or that results in unintended biases and discriminatory outcomes, which could harm our reputation and business and expose us to risks related to inaccuracies or errors in the output of such technologies Operating problems in our busine...”

Its annual reports, year by year

Sentences naming AI in each annual report, counted by one rule, beside the median report in the Index that year. Each count links its filing. Every company, by year and sector

• Fiscal 20210median 0
• Fiscal 20220median 0
• Fiscal 20230median 1
• Fiscal 20240median 4
• Fiscal 20255median 10

Headcount by filing year

As reported in each year's annual report, with the filing. A year marked not read had no figure the reading could take from the report's text.

Limits of this reading

• No count by segment; the split follows the three segments’ revenue by description.
• The geography table (Europe 56%, Asia 39%) omits the United States and is not usable.

Source: the company's annual report on EDGAR, accession 0000076282-26-000007, the filing. Read by Claude Fable 5.1 under rubric version 1, by the method. A company can write to info@stratussc.com to have its reading checked against its filing.