The Work Bench · Customer Service Representatives
Review policy terms for coverage
The task, from O*NET: Review insurance policy terms to determine whether a particular loss is covered by insurance.
Typical length 17 minutes. Time split: documents 100%. About 316,336,784 hours a year of desk work across the US go to this task.
Passes, one attempt by Claude Fable 5.1. The rubric was written 2026-10-01 02:56 UTC, before the attempt (2026-10-01 03:06 UTC); the grade came last (2026-10-01 03:09 UTC).
One attempt at one task on one date, with constructed material: it is not a statement that the job, or this task in a given workplace, can be done by AI. The rubric, the attempt and the grade were made by the same model in one session, in that order; a person's check of a sample of grades will be published beside them.
The brief
You handle first coverage reads for the claims intake desk at Harbor Street Mutual, a homeowners insurer. Policyholder M. Okafor (policy HO-55-20931) reported that a washing machine supply hose burst on September 20 and water damaged the laundry room floor, the hallway's hardwood floor and the drywall of an adjacent closet; a rug and a basket of clothes were also soaked. The hose was about nine years old and failed from age. The field adjuster asks for your first read before the inspection: what is covered, what is not, which deductible applies, and what information is still needed. Write it for the adjuster, in plain words, and make clear it is a first read subject to the inspection.
The material
Constructed for this example; the names, figures and documents are invented.
POLICY EXCERPTS, form HO-3 as issued to this policyholder Coverage A, Dwelling. We insure against sudden and accidental direct physical loss to the dwelling, except as excluded below. Coverage C, Personal Property. We insure personal property against direct physical loss caused by the following named perils: fire or lightning; windstorm or hail; theft; accidental discharge or overflow of water or steam from within a plumbing, heating, air conditioning or automatic fire protective sprinkler system or from within a household appliance; freezing; and the other perils listed in the form. Exclusions applying to Coverage A: 1. Continuous or repeated seepage or leakage of water, or the presence or condensation of humidity, moisture or vapor, over a period of weeks, months or years. 2. Wear and tear, marring, deterioration, inherent vice, latent defect or mechanical breakdown. However, we do insure the ensuing loss caused by water unless the ensuing loss is itself excluded. 3. Flood, surface water, waves, tidal water, or water that backs up through sewers or drains. 4. Mold, fungus or wet rot, except as provided under Limited Fungi Coverage: we will pay up to $5,000 for loss caused by mold, fungus or wet rot that results from a covered water loss, including the cost of removal and testing. DECLARATIONS Coverage A, Dwelling: $420,000 Coverage C, Personal Property: $210,000 Standard deductible: $1,000 per occurrence Endorsement WD-2500, Water Damage Deductible: a $2,500 deductible applies in place of the standard deductible to any loss caused by the discharge, overflow or leakage of water from plumbing, appliances or heating and cooling systems. No mold coverage increase purchased. CLAIM INTAKE NOTES Date of loss: September 20. Reported: September 21. The policyholder was at home, heard water running, and found the laundry room flooded within about an hour of the hose failing. The water supply was shut off at the valve. The failed part is the rubber supply hose to the washing machine, about nine years old; the policyholder says it 'just split'. The policyholder has replaced the hose and kept the old one. The washing machine itself is working and shows no damage. Damage described: laundry room vinyl floor lifted; hallway hardwood (about 60 square feet) cupping; closet drywall wet to about 18 inches; a wool rug and a basket of clothes soaked. No standing water remains; fans were rented and are running. No prior water claims on the policy.
The rubric, written before the attempt
- Concludes that the resulting water damage to the dwelling is covered under Coverage A as a sudden and accidental loss, and explains why the seepage exclusion does not apply. Evidence: A coverage conclusion for the floors and drywall, citing that the failure was sudden and discovered within about an hour, so exclusion 1 (seepage over weeks, months or years) does not apply.
- Applies the ensuing-loss clause correctly: the worn hose itself is excluded as wear and tear, but the water damage that followed is covered. Evidence: States both halves: the hose (and any appliance repair, if claimed) falls under exclusion 2 and is not paid, while the ensuing water damage is insured by the 'however' sentence.
- Identifies the rug and clothes as covered under Coverage C's named peril for accidental discharge of water from a household appliance. Evidence: Names Coverage C and the accidental discharge peril for the contents.
- States the correct deductible: $2,500 under endorsement WD-2500, in place of the $1,000 standard deductible. Evidence: The $2,500 figure named as the applicable deductible with the endorsement as the reason.
- Flags the mold limitation: up to $5,000 only if mold results from this covered water loss, with no increase purchased. Evidence: The $5,000 limit mentioned as a watch item for the adjuster.
- Lists the information still needed before a decision, and says the read is subject to the inspection. Evidence: At least three of: photographs, repair estimates, the retained hose or confirmation of a sudden failure, mitigation and fan rental invoices, an inventory of damaged contents, moisture readings; and an explicit statement that the inspection decides.
- Invents no policy language, coverage or amount that is not in the excerpts. Evidence: Every clause, limit and deductible cited appears in the material.
The attempt, one pass, unedited
Claude Fable 5.1, written 2026-10-01 03:06 UTC from the brief and the material only.
FIRST COVERAGE READ, subject to inspection Policy HO-55-20931, M. Okafor. Loss of September 20: washing machine supply hose burst. 1. What is covered Dwelling, Coverage A. The water damage to the laundry room vinyl floor, the hallway hardwood (about 60 square feet, cupping) and the closet drywall (wet to about 18 inches) is a sudden and accidental direct physical loss. The seepage exclusion (exclusion 1, continuous or repeated leakage over weeks, months or years) does not fit the facts: the hose split, the policyholder heard water running and found the laundry room flooded within about an hour, and the supply valve was shut. The wear and tear exclusion (exclusion 2) reaches the hose itself, which was about nine years old and failed from age, but not the damage that followed. The form says: however, we do insure the ensuing loss caused by water unless the ensuing loss is itself excluded. The water damage to the floors and drywall is not itself excluded, so it is covered. The hose is not paid for. The washing machine shows no damage and nothing is claimed for it; if a repair were claimed later, mechanical breakdown under exclusion 2 would exclude it. Personal property, Coverage C. The wool rug and the basket of clothes fall under the named peril of accidental discharge or overflow of water from within a household appliance. Covered, subject to proof of the items and their value. Mitigation. The policyholder rented fans and is drying the area. The excerpts I have do not address reimbursement of mitigation costs, so I leave that to you; the invoices should be collected either way. 2. What is not covered, or is limited The failed supply hose: wear and tear, exclusion 2. Mold, fungus or wet rot: if any develops from this loss, it is limited to $5,000 under Limited Fungi Coverage, including removal and testing, and no increase was purchased. Flag this for the inspection, since cupped hardwood and wet drywall are where it would appear. Nothing in the notes points to flood, surface water or sewer backup, so exclusion 3 is not in play. 3. Deductible $2,500, not the standard $1,000. Endorsement WD-2500 applies a $2,500 deductible in place of the standard deductible to any loss caused by the discharge, overflow or leakage of water from plumbing, appliances or heating and cooling systems, and this is appliance water. 4. What is still needed before a decision - Photographs of every affected area and of the failed hose. The policyholder kept the old hose; please collect or photograph it to confirm a sudden split rather than a long-term leak at the connection. - Repair estimates for the vinyl floor, the hardwood (refinish or replace) and the drywall. - Moisture readings at inspection, to set the scope for the hardwood and drywall and to watch for mold. - The fan rental and any other mitigation invoices. - An inventory of the damaged contents with values or receipts. - Confirmation that the loss was first noticed on September 20 and that there was no earlier leaking at that connection; the intake notes say no prior water claims. Bottom line for the adjuster: a covered water loss under Coverage A and Coverage C; the hose excluded; the $2,500 water damage deductible; mold capped at $5,000 if it develops; all subject to your inspection and the documents above.
The grade
Graded 2026-10-01 03:09 UTC against the rubric above, by the same model.
| Criterion | Result | Note |
|---|---|---|
| r1 | pass | Covered under A as sudden and accidental; the seepage exclusion is ruled out on the hour-long discovery and the shut valve. |
| r2 | pass | Hose excluded as wear and tear; the ensuing water damage insured by the 'however' sentence; the appliance repair point covered as a contingency. |
| r3 | pass | Rug and clothes under Coverage C, accidental discharge from a household appliance, subject to proof. |
| r4 | pass | $2,500 under WD-2500 in place of the $1,000 standard, with the endorsement's wording as the reason. |
| r5 | pass | $5,000 Limited Fungi Coverage flagged as a watch item, with no increase purchased. |
| r6 | pass | Six items listed, and the read is marked subject to inspection at the top and the bottom. |
| r7 | pass | Every clause, limit and deductible cited is in the excerpts; on mitigation the attempt says the excerpts do not address it rather than asserting coverage. |
Overall: passes. A clean first read: the four questions the adjuster asked are answered in order, the ensuing-loss reasoning is correct, and the deductible endorsement is caught. The attempt handled the one point the excerpts do not settle (mitigation costs) by saying so. It did not estimate amounts, which the brief did not ask for.
How the examples are made and graded: the method. Every task of this job, with its length and when it comes within reach: Customer Service Representatives.